A closer look at legends leagues

Over the last few years there has been a rise in ‘legends leagues’ featuring former international players predominantly in the Middle East and South Asia. As these events generally involve retired players who have not played official cricket in the preceding 24 months, they do not require an ICC sanction. While some events have been locally sanctioned by Member Boards, a small number have operated outside the purview of a Member Board and therefore, deemed disapproved/unsanctioned cricket.

The concept of legends leagues is not new. In 2016, a Masters Champions League that took place in the UAE was reported to have lacked professionalism and marred with financial difficulties, a trend seemingly continuing in the more recent legends leagues. In one instance reports suggested that an ICC Member had to cover player payments when the organisers defaulted.

The risk to players who participate in unsanctioned leagues is the possibility of exclusion from future involvement in official, sanctioned leagues. Another risk of unsanctioned legends leagues is corruption, and reports suggest that the recent Legends Cricket Trophy (LCT) may be one such example. Allegations surfaced of retired international players being approached by team management to fix matches. Other leagues that were sanctioned locally, have also come to attention for the wrong reasons. These leagues have been known to be disorganised, with financial issues relating to outstanding player, accommodation, and other logistical payments.  

While these leagues may have the potential to boost sports tourism and cricket development, the potential risk for integrity issues may threaten not only the league’s reputation but the associated ICC Member. The inherent risks concerning legends leagues underscore the importance of weighing potential risks against the rewards before getting involved.